Locke essay concerning human understanding tabula rasa
The "Educationalists" believed that children were born as "blank slates", beginning their lives morally neutral. From this point of view, infants were neither inherently good or inherently evil. A child's nature and personality would develop over childhood, a period of time during which the educationalists believed a child was particularly impressionable. Adults surrounding a child could potentially have a very lasting effect on his personality. Perhaps the man most influential to educationalist theory was John Locke.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Background | GradeSaver
English thinker John Locke insisted both that children are potentially free and rational beings, and that the realization of these crucial human qualities tends to be thwarted through imposition of the sort of prejudice that perpetuates oppression and superstition. It was, Locke believed, upbringing and education that stymied development of children's humanity when the older generation, itself enmeshed in prejudice, preferred to maintain the status quo rather than to examine whether their lives qualified as truly human through the rational and free action characteristic of autonomous individuals. Locke argued that when an older generation imposes unquestioned beliefs and ways of action on its youth, the outcome is bondage rather than actualization of freedom. The problem of the actualization and preservation of human freedom and rationality occupied Locke in all of his major works, from the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and the Two Treatises of Government , through his four letters Concerning Toleration , , , , The Reasonableness of Christianity , Some Thoughts Concerning Education , and the posthumous Of the Conduct of the Understanding
The group had gathered to consider questions of morality and revealed religion knowledge of God derived through revelation. Locke pointed out that, before they could make…. Locke remained in Holland for more than five years —
In this essay I argue that the late philosopher Locke has the most compelling theory of metaphysics. Second, I discuss how Locke argues how we obtain knowledge, empiricism and representationalism, and knowledge about the work varies between strong and weak inferences. The Blank Slate theory asserts that thoughts are formed first through exposure to different sensations followed by reflection on the experience.