Are stalemates on your leadershipteam making you a dictator by default? Stop blaming your people—start fixing the process. Frisch calls this phenomenon the dictator-by-default syndrome. Many companies turn to team-building and communication exercises to try to fix the situation.
How to Reach a Consensus: 9 Steps (with Pictures) - wikiHow
Leaders give plenty of thought to the data and analysis needed to kick off and carry on these sorts of discussions. If everyone reports to one boss and that person is in the room, the answer is simple. If not, who is accountable? Does the verdict rest on the vote, or is the vote advisory? If it is the latter, to whom will the recommendation be elevated? If it determines the decision, what is required?
Consensus Planning: Align the Demand Plan to Business Objectives
We are continuing our blog series on strategic planning by focusing on Step 3 of our 4 Step Strategic Planning Process: Facilitate Consensus. Read more about our previous strategic planning blogs in this series here , here , and here. The main purpose of this third step is for the strategic planning team to start to reach agreement about the future direction. Organizations will often form strategic planning committees or task leadership teams to complete their strategic plan. This means that different types of people with various perspectives and insights will have to learn to work together on a common goal.
Group decision making can lead to improved outcomes, but only if a variety of conditions pertaining to group chemistry are satisfied. Assess the advantages and disadvantages that should be considered in leveraging collaborative decision-making. Group decision making also known as collaborative decision making is when individuals collectively make a choice from the alternatives before them. Such decisions are not attributable to any single individual, but to the group as a whole. Group decisions are subject to factors such as social influence, including peer pressure, and group dynamics.