If a person believes that they are nice person, but they go around and perform mean actions then some existentialists would say that they are mean person based on the actions they performed. There are no good or bad situations. Overall, Kant would not be okay with a person lying because it would create the opportunity that it is okay for everyone to lie. Mill would be okay with a simple white lie because someone other than yourself is benefited from it, but Mill would not be okay with a big lie. He gives a description of the blameworthy type of self-love which he argues it is not self-love at all. The main point in these two sections is that the vicious form of self-love involves selfishness since it rests on a false view of the self.
Are people naturally good or evil? Example | Graduateway
Defying the existence of good and evil continues to be widely debated in the field of philosophy of religion, specifically when debating the moral capabilities of God. The existence of evil and suffering in the world poses serious issues for the existence of God. More specifically, for the existence of an omnipotent, benevolent, and omniscient God. The purpose of this essay is to develop a general argument for the claim that good and evil both have to exist and to explain what absolute good and evil are. Also, to dive into the question: why would God allow for evil? I intend to show that there is a reason as to why God would allow for evil that does not undermine his omnipotence or power. The world requires amount of balance in all aspects.
With philosophers and theorist having had devised theories to prove their thoughts and opinions over this matter, human nature in regards to being innately good or evil, is still up for debate. Two famous Chinese philosophers from B. Meng Tzu, in his excerpt "Man 's Nature is Good," drawn from chapter twenty-one from his work Meniscuis, argued that people are innately….